How top US counterterror official called out Trump's Iran war bluff

When a seasoned US military veteran, ex-CIA officer and the sitting counterterror chief resigns over the Iran war, it cannot be taken lightly. Joe Kent's shocking and dramatic exit as the director of the Counterterrorism Centre stands as the most high-profile rebuke yet of Trump's war on Iran, which is now in its third week without any endgame in sight. His damning letter, saying Iran posed "no imminent threat" to the US, comes at a time when Trump is already facing uncomfortable questions about the basis and the direction of his Iran campaign.

"I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran... Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby," Kent, who oversaw the agency responsible for analysing terror intel, said in his letter.

JOE KENT: SANE VOICE IN TRUMP CABINET?

In an eccentric Trump cabinet, which has been all over the place over its justification for the Iran war, Kent has emerged as a pragmatic and sane voice. His caution on Iran rekindles the mistake the US made 20 years ago in Iraq. While the US justified its Iraq invasion on the fact that it possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), it was later proven false.

It's not that Kent let the cat out of the bag on Iran. His statement offered nothing new, but what was already known -- that Trump had no concrete rationale for attacking Iran now, and the war was launched without planning.

It takes us back to the most important question: Why did Trump start a war with Iran in the first place?

While Kent does not directly address the issue, he argued that Trump was misled about the threat posed by Iran. He alleged that "high-ranking Israeli officials" and "lobbyists" goaded Trump to join the Middle East war, which has left 13 American soldiers dead.

Notably, the US-Israel strikes on Tehran came in the midst of negotiations over Iran's nuclear program.

"Until June 2025, you understood that the wars in the Middle East were a trap that robbed America of the precious lives of our patriots and depleted the wealth of our nation," he said.

The Trump administration was quick to dismiss the letter, saying the President had "compelling evidence" that Iran was going to attack the US first.

WHY JOE KENT'S RESIGNATION MATTERS?

However, Kent's assessment cannot be just brushed off. After all, he served in the US Army Special Forces and participated in 11 combat missions, including the war in Iraq. He also worked as a paramilitary officer for the CIA before entering politics. That's a wealth of experience on wars and conflicts.

Moreover, he knows the personal cost of a prolonged conflict. Kent lost his wife, Shannon, in a 2019 bombing in Syria. Thus, a figure like Kent, also an avid supporter of Trump, accusing Israel of influencing the President to enter the war, is a very damning charge.

"It serves as an illustration of how Trump's actions go against the advice of the relevant military, intelligence and foreign affairs experts in government," Paul Quirk, a professor at the University of British Columbia, told Al Jazeera.

There has been increasing evidence and reports that the final authorisation for the Iran strikes occurred during discussions at Mar-a-Lago (Trump's golf resort).

Trump's top military adviser, General Dan Caine, even fired a warning shot, citing risks to US troops in the Middle East and America's own strained weapon stockpile. But Trump, being Trump, dismissed those warnings.

Such high-stakes military campaigns, like the one in Iran, require clear political goals. We, as well as Trump, seem to be searching for this answer since February 28, when joint US-Israel strikes snuffed out 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. If Trump thought the Iranian regime would capitulate, he was clearly wrong.

Since Day 1 of the war, Trump's explanations for it have shifted more frequently than even former Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar has switched sides. It seems the 'Paltu Ram' moniker has a new contender.

Trump's objectives have ranged from destroying Iran's nuclear programme, preventing Iranian retaliation against Israel, and regime change. It has led to growing unease among Trump's coterie and his MAGA base.

DID ISRAEL FORCE TRUMP INTO IRAN WAR?

A crucial aspect highlighted by Kent was Israel's role and whether Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu forced Trump's hand.

In his letter, Kent said the decision to go to war was shaped by an "echo chamber" involving Israeli officials and lobby groups. A section of experts has already suggested that this is a war being fought on Israel's behalf.

A week ago, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged it in no uncertain terms. Rubio, speaking to the media, said Israel's determination to attack Iran and the certainty that US troops in the region would be targeted in retaliation forced Trump to order pre-emptive strikes.

It is no secret that a regime change in Iran has been a decades-old obsession for Israel. In fact, Netanyahu had been pushing hard for another war for months after the brief 12-day conflict in 2025. "Netanyahu has been yearning, dreaming of doing this for 40 years," journalist and geopolitical expert Mehdi Hasan told India Today.

According to a report in the New York Times, the Israeli PM lobbied Trump personally for months to keep him on the path to war. Netanyahu was worried that negotiations between the US and Iran could undermine the plans.

As per the report, Netanyahu first raised the prospect of hitting Iran's missile sites during his meeting with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate in December last year.

On February 11, he was back in Washington. This time, Netanyahu secured assurances of a wider US involvement in a campaign against Iran. Two weeks later, Trump dropped bombs on Tehran.

Against this backdrop, Kent's abrupt exit and his loud criticism carry weight. It also signals fissures within Trump's support base and administration. Vice President JD Vance has also been sceptical of the US offensive, even though he has publicly denied reports of a rift.

"Joe Kent is the bravest man I know, and he can't be dismissed as a nut. He's leaving a job that gave him access to the highest-level relevant intelligence," political activist and analyst Tucker Carlson told NYT in an interview.

- Ends

Tune In